Chief Coroner, coroners and pathologists and investigations into whether the covid jab contributed to death

They aren't interested - officially

I asked 2 local coroner’s offices, the Chief Coroner’s Office, the College of Policing, the pathological Society, the Royal College of Pathologists and the Home Office this (with small tweaks to make it individual to each):

Sirs,

I have been looking at the Office for National Statistics website and their weekly deaths report for the 26th August 2022.

It seems that since approximately May 2021 the number of deaths in this country has been consistently and significantly higher than the 5 year average, between 15% and 30% depending on total numbers, whether the person died at home, in hospital or a care home and so on. 

Even when the deaths involving covid are removed - a diagnosis that requires no medical evidence of any kind to confirm and which the ONS defines quite ludicrously as:

"Coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths

COVID-19 deaths are those deaths registered in England and Wales in the stated week where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate. A doctor can certify the involvement of COVID-19 based on symptoms and clinical findings; a positive test result is not required."

These excess deaths in the past 18 months or so are very concerning and are now numbering in the tens of thousands in all age groups.

My questions are:

1 - have any of the Home Office and/or any of it’s registered forensic pathologists carried out or is carrying out any investigation into why the number of excess deaths have been so high for so long either independently or with the MHRA/ONS/DHSC/UKHSA/Coroner’s Office?

2 - is the Home office recommending that registered forensic pathologists carry out autopsies to ascertain if the SARS-CoV-2 (covid) vaccinations may be a contributory cause into the excess deaths especially in those people who died within 6 months of receiving a covid vaccination?

3 - has the Home Office recommended it’s registered forensic pathologists to perform autopsies carried out in the UK to follow a protocol such as that recommended by Prof. Dr. Burkhardt of the Reutlingen Pathology Laboratory or another protocol especially in those people who died within 6 months of receiving a covid vaccination in an effort to ascertain or establish if the correlation between the rise in all-cause mortality numbers with the roll-out of the covid vaccinations leads to causation or is “just coincidence”?

Yours sincerely

The results were:

• Home Office logged it as an official FOI request, awaiting answer

• College of Policing - closed the enquiry without response

• Pathological Society - never responded even though I received an auto-response message

• Royal College of Pathologists - never responded

• Chief Coroner’s Office slopey shouldered all responsibility

  • “The role of coroners, who are judges, is to investigate certain types of death (unnatural and violent deaths, where the deaths are in custody or otherwise in state detention or where the cause of death is unknown).  The role of the Chief Coroner is to provide judicial leadership for coroners, including by providing guidance, training.

    It is not the function of the Chief Coroner to provide analysis or interpretation of mortality statistics, not least because many of the deaths in the statistics will be from natural causes (including from COVID-19). Coroners do not investigate individual deaths from natural causes.

    Decisions about whether to request a post-mortem examination in an individual case are judicial decisions for individual coroners and the Chief Coroner has no power to require them to conduct post-mortem examinations in specific cases or types of case. “

• both local coroner’s offices replied.

• one called me and explained that it’s not in their remit to request autopsies or special tests if a doctor says “nothing to look at”. We had a good chat and she was interested as an individual especially at the danger points of 1 day, 2 weeks and 5 months.

• One replied with this:

  • “Mr XXXXX thanks you for email yesterday and notes the information requested. Please note that the Coroners Service is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and your request is outside Mr XXXXX’s remit.”

• One replied with this:

• I understand that you have spoken to my office as well as emailing in with concerns around statistics for weekly death reports.

  It would be difficult to say whether the Coroners Office has observed a rise in the number of deaths since the 1st of May 2021. As you will appreciate, only certain deaths are reported to my office. That is inevitably quite variable and any meaningful analysis very difficult simply based on the number of referrals.

  In relation to autopsies carried out, these are individual judicial decisions based on the reported circumstances of each death. The circumstances in which a coroner may order a post-mortem examination to be made will again be infinitely variable. 

  I appreciate this may not assist you greatly, but it is important to understand that deaths are reported into the Coroners Office in accordance with the Reporting of Deaths Regulations. From that point on, how each death is investigated is a matter for each coroner making an independent judicial decision based on the facts presented and what appears to be a reasonable and a proportionate inquiry into those facts.

So I sent anyone who replied this answer hoping (wishful thinking? Probably) that something may sink into their thoughts like pushing a balloon through wet cement:

Thank you for your reply, it is much appreciated.

I have two questions that I cannot get an answer to from any government department, government Minister, medicines regulator, pathologist, police force etc so far and they are:

1 -  if a medicinal drug or procedure is suspected of, causes or contributes to a person’s death, no matter how much time has elapsed then it cannot be classified as a “natural cause” can it? 

It must be a suspicious or unexplained death that requires a full post-mortem and that might result in a verdict in a Coroner’s Court of unlawful killing that leads to a trial for corporate manslaughter, corporate murder or malfeasance/misfeasance in public office.

2 - who is responsible for initiating an investigation into the causes of a continuous and ever increasing all-cause mortality rate that correlates with the introduction of a experimental, never before tried on humans medicinal product that has no long-term safety trials conducted?

So far every professional body, regulator and judicial department has said “not within our remit”.

Here is a scenario - I admit I have not included links, names, countries, FOIs etc but I do have them and supporting documents available:

• October 2019 - a government changes the legislation on medicines and vaccinations to allow for a completely new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) before the Public Assessment Report (PAR), that requires completed Phase 3 safety trials to be completed, is written and released

• October 2019 - a government advisory panel on medicines and vaccinations releases a list of adverse events that they will be closely monitoring after a new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) is released in coming months

• December 2020 - the new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) is given Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) and immediately the roll-out of the new vaccination commences for vulnerable and “at high risk” persons - the exact group that was NOT included in the truncated safety trial

• February 2021 - the PAR is released with much of the safety trial data missing, biodistribution studies not performed, accusations of fake and forged data, the control group during the trial unblinded and given the vaccination, reported problems with the Quality Control during the manufacturing process resulting in variable amounts of the active ingredient in each batch between zero and 3x what the recommended dose should be, the numerous failures in the manufacturing process reported during an official inspection of one of the factories and many other issues with the vaccinations from all manufacturers

• children under 18, pregnant women, those with co-morbidities or serious health issues and the aged were NOT included in any safety trial prior to the roll-out of the vaccination in that particular demographic

• as the vaccination roll-out continues many countries worldwide notice a spike in all-cause mortality within 2 weeks of the vaccination being given

• as more groups are added into the roll-out the all-cause mortality increases and continues without subsequently dropping

• as more groups are added into the roll-out the age of “sudden deaths” and the average age of deaths starts dropping and this age drop continues

• between Feb 2021 and to date many deaths are observed and reported many of which match the adverse events that were listed in Oct 2019 and that were to be monitored closely

• between Feb 2021 and to date many scientific research papers are released question the “safe and effective” narrative for the new type vaccinations and listing possible medical problems they will/are causing

• the cause of deaths for the increased mortality closely matches the earlier adverse events to be monitored closely after the vaccination roll-out

• mid-2022 independent research shows that the new type vaccinations are contributing to the cause death in an average of 5 months from the date of the person receiving the vaccination with verification of a correlation/causation with statements by funeral directors, embalmers and independent researchers

• independent post-mortems carried out in Germany show that the majority of deaths of those examined could be directly attributed to the new type vaccination

• from Oct 2019 to date there is still no official release of the truncated safety trial data for independent analysis nor and no official release of any data or information to support the “safe and effective” narrative in the long term (1 year plus)

If you require links to verify the above scenario for yourself, contacts of those who performed the research, the FOIs I have and so on then do not hesitate to get in contact with me as I will be only too pleased to supply the information for you and the Coroner (even if it is in a private capacity) to perform further, more in-depth research in to this matter but to be honest it should not take longer than 10 minutes of independent searching of the internet to bring to light sufficient instances of the correlation between the introduction of the “covid vaccinations” and the increasing numbers of all-cause mortality around the world that are being reported in not just the UK but the EU, the USA and other countries.

I do know that correlation is not causation but as NOT one government or regulator worldwide has admitted to or released any research that shows that there is NOT a connection between the “covid vaccination” programme and the increased, sustained and continuing all-cause mortality numbers except to say “coincidence” or “safe and effective” without back-up evidence nor independently verified research to support their statements an official investigation is becoming ever more urgent.

UK coroners should be at the forefront of this as used to be known as being impartial and independent and led by facts and evidence. Or is this no longer the case?

The high all-cause mortality figures especially in younger age groups should be ringing alarm bells with those who are tasked with the responsibility to find out what really caused the death of a person because if it is shown to be a medicinal product then the regulators need to know so that they can review the medicine’s safety record and take the necessary steps to stop further harm and deaths from it. 

Without this independent input the regulators cannot perform their duties in full can they and a dangerous and unsafe medicine will continue to be used and continue to contribute to deaths.

So once again I ask as I seriously wish to know they answer - who in a position of authority is going to officially investigate if correlation is or is not causation of the link between the excess deaths and the new “covid vaccinations”.

Yours sincerely

Not one reply has been received.

The Chief Coroner’s Office and local coroners DO have the authority from what I understand to issue guidelines, standards etc to local coroners or other authorities (such as pathologists, doctors etc) on when an autopsy and inquest should be performed and/or required plus specify which tests or protocols to use.

So the obvious conclusion from this is that no-one wants to stick their neck out officially and start investigating as they know what they will find.