First, here is my reply to thiir e-mail:
Thank you, very informative.
I will keep the reply for posterity as it made me chuckle.
Couldn’t think what else to say as they are beyond parody now.
Now the fun bit:
Dear Mr Git,
Thank you for your email.
In response to your questions. (they don’t mention it here but it was if they asked Pfizer for the document in question once I gave it to them)
No, we did not ask Pfizer. The reason we didn’t is as we set out in our previous reply: pharmaceutical companies have obligations to submit periodic reports of post marketing safety data to regulatory authorities for countries where their products are authorised. Therefore, the MHRA will have received similar periodic reports from Pfizer containing all the post marketing safety data reporting during that time period.
Did you take into account these new lists of side-effects?
The listed events in the document are not side effects, the document lists data on suspected ADRs, and also lists the adverse events of special interest (AESIs), which are events which have been identified by regulators and the vaccine manufacturers as those which should be closely monitored due to the possibility of an immune-mediated mechanism. But as stated in the previous response, we consider data from a range of sources, including the Yellow Card scheme and global post marketing safety data from manufacturers, in our ongoing assessment of the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines. Our position on the document, which contains post marketing safety data up to 28 February 2021, is that no new safety concerns arise from the data.
We hope this provides the clarification you are seeking.
Kind regards
MHRA Customer Experience Centre
Communications and engagement.
Did you like the comment “no new safety concerns arise from the data” - does this mean they never looked or did they already know. Very ambiguous and disingenuous isn’t it?
And the system relies on the pharmaceutical companies being 100% honest 100% of the time.
Yeah right!!!
And when is a side-effect not a side-effect? When it’s an ADR or an adverse event of special interest of course.
How silly of me.
That interesting! And worrying!
But I’m still gobsmacked that things are being flagged or recalled and reported in msm for far less than any of the so called monitoring set ups like Yellow Card and VAERS. Another example is the eye drop story
Thanks AG. " Very ambiguous and disingenuous isn’t it?" Downright lying hounds imo.