Sent on the 10th August 2020 - received zero replies and only automatically generated acknowledgements:
An Open letter to:
Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
By letter and e-mail to boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
cc:
Matthew John David Hancock
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Department of Health and Social Care
39 Victoria Street
London
SW1H 0EU
By letter and e-mail to matt.hancock.mp@parliament.uk
Sir William Cash
Member of Parliament for Stone
50 High Street
Stone
Staffordshire
ST15 8AU
by letter and email to cashw@parliament.uk office@stoneconservatives.co.uk
Jeremy Richard Streynsham Hunt
Chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee
e-mail to huntj@parliament.uk, hsccom@parliament.uk
Sir Graham Brady
1922 committee Chair
by e-mail to altsale@parliament.uk
1922 Committee members:
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
Sir Charles Walker
by e-mail to cliftonbrowng@parliament.uk, charles.walker.mp@parliament.uk,
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer
Leader of HM Opposition
by e-mail to keir.starmer.mp@parliament.uk
cc by letter and/or e-mail to (but not limited to):
Toby Young, journalist
Simon Dolan, Keep Britain Free
UKColumn
Jim Stone
various internet based blogs
various newspapers and MSM TV based news companies
Boris,
I address this to “Call me Boris” as you no longer warrant the respect that Sir, Mr Johnson or Prime Minister conveys.
Even the office of Prime Minister has been sullied over the past 30-50 years and no longer deserves the respect that august position once did on the world stage.
I make no apologies for any strong language that appears in this letter as sometimes there are no words sufficiently strong enough to convey my feelings in everyday modern English so sometimes it is necessary to use old-fashioned language that is adequately robust enough to describe the feelings exactly as I feel them and I hope you will understand why they are used in the context they are.
This is the second time in 21 years that my business has been utterly and totally destroyed by Government malice, incompetence and greed to meet an unknown agenda and I don’t know if I have the energy and drive to start over from nothing a 3rd time.
Last time was due to that economic illiterate Gordon Brown and the introduction of IR35 which recently after 20 years the House of Lords has finally got round to investigating it and called it a “politically motivated spiteful piece of legislation”.
I have been following the “covid-19” farce since February 2020 and at no time has anything that has come from a government or local authority or from international agencies and quangos made much sense due to a complete lack of internal logic as per Government press releases, actions and so on and I would like to know why?
It has morphed from “all is OK, just wash your hands” to “it’s only for 3 weeks to save the NHS” to “a little longer to flatten the curve” to “we must wait on a vaccine or we will all die” and now is “wear a mask or kill your granny while waiting for a vaccine” and I want to know why?
What are the justifications for incarcerating billions of people, destroying the economy of the world, ripping apart the social fabric of nations, vilifying the few sovereign nations that had the temerity not to follow the agenda and killing more people as collateral damage than the original virus was modelled to kill, a computer model that was not peer reviewed, written by a non-computer programmer and who is someone with a record of failure in modelling and when the programme was eventually studied by professional computer programmers and modellers was torn to shreds for many reasons?
So far nothing that has been released into the public domain has justified it to my satisfaction so what is going on all over the world?
I have sent FOI requests, contacted my MP, contacted yourself as the Prime Minister, contacted various Government ministers, tried submitting questions to the daily press briefings, contacted various “news” companies, contacted local councils and since March 2020 I have not had 1 (one) single coherent answer when I did, on the very rare occasion, receive a reply.
The local council replies especially were full of factual inaccuracies and ignorance of the various pieces of legislation they are supposed to follow and work to and an admission that they were overstepping their powers and acting illegally to enforce measures that were not law not enforceable.
Your Government, the Opposition, the Civil Service and local authorities and virtually the majority of MPs have treated their constituents and the population of this country with utter contempt.
I know of many people who have written to their MP with their concerns over the situation and very few actually received an answer, the vast majority were totally ignored.
Those few who have received an answer, the replies generally can be paraphrased as “blah blah blah, piffle, waffle, “follow the science” do as you are told, follow the agenda and narrative, you should not ask those questions”.
I was one of the honoured few, I did receive a reply.
The 1 (one) reply I received from my MP, Sir William Cash, was “Many thanks for your recent correspondence – please do not hesitate to contact me again on any issue where you feel I may be of assistance.”.
Not exactly answering anything or taking anything seriously is it?
Utter contempt for the electorate. It would have been less insulting for him to ignore me.
Is this because the members of both Houses of Parliament have been totally supine since February and conspicuous by their absence and lack of holding the Government to account and have just surrendered all powers and allowed the country to be governed by Ministerial diktat and edict, Twitter announcements and Statutory Instruments that have had zero Parliamentary debate or scrutiny, allowed psychological warfare to be used against the British population, allowed the deliberate confusion, muddling and obfuscation between “guidance”, “guidelines” and actual law and handed over decision making to an unelected cabal of “experts” who, along with many people in positions of authority within Government and business, are all linked almost incestuously back to a couple of very, very rich individuals who have their own well documented agenda well.
The “Opposition” argument consists of “lockdown should have been earlier, more draconian measures, more stringent lockdowns, more more more totalitarian creep and destruction of the country”.
Not a peep on whether any of the measures were justified in any way, shape or form and certainly no meaningful holding Government to account.
It is also not quite the “mother of all Parliaments” that it likes to portray itself as. The reality is something different.
I know “tradition” now is that the monarch does not get involved in “political” decisions but tradition be damned, this is when we needed a strong monarch more than anytime since Oliver Cromwell was ruler but what happened?
Her Majesty was usurped and effectively went into hiding (officially isolation or shielding) at Windsor Castle and has been totally incommunicado only coming out for a very few public relations appearances and a speech that ended with the comment “for those that come after us” which has various alternative meanings and was echoed almost word for word in the World Health Organisation TV adverts at the same time which was very suspect.
Add on that not one single MSM outlet or social media site will even report in a semi-favourable light any view that does not meet and is inconsistent with the “we’re all going to die, do as you are told” narrative and that not one MSM site will entertain or publish a full and open discussion on the covid-19 topic is telling in itself.
You and your Ministers stated time and time again “we are following the science”.
I am not quite sure what science you are following but it does not match what science I have researched over the past 6 months.
An hour searching the internet can come up with hundreds if not thousands of independent research papers, scientific studies and official documentation going back many years that not just contradicts your Government’s and your “experts” science but rips it into small pieces, chews it up and spits it out into the nearest waste receptacle.
If your highly paid researchers cannot find this information then they do not deserve to be called researchers.
I was going to do a comprehensive breakdown of a lot of what I have researched over the months then thought why?
Boris, you are not known for being a “details man” and if this country ever survives and comes out the other end of this dark period in our history a free and sovereign nation then the subsequent Court of Inquiry can investigate the deliberate policies designed to maximise deaths within the population, the neglect of people in care homes, the deaths from continuing treatments that were found to be totally unsuitable for months after this was known, the falsifying of causes of deaths on death certificate, the use of the British Army on waging psychological warfare on the general population and so on.
I will just concentrate on “my science” and put together a few facts and see how it compares with the Government’s experts science that they are following and ask a few questions for clarifications that I will highlight in bold italics.
Boris, everything I am going to quote you should know as it is all in the public domain. Surely you are not that naive or ignorant that you do not know what is going on in the country and the world outside of the Westminster and media bubble?
Surely your researchers, experts and civil servants are keeping you fully briefed on what is happening.
If they are then it would be a waste of my time.
If they are not then this country and the world is in deeper trouble than I envisioned and the common purpose, communist-leaning, medical-fascist, one world, green utopia cabal are fully in control and we have a major battle on our hands to get all our freedoms returned to us.
So with the above in mind I will put forward some bullet points that have never been addressed adequately and which many answers from Governments etc have been verging on the nonsensical at times.
Coherent, factual and intelligent answers would be much appreciated.
Select Committee for Health and Social Care, 21st July 2020:
CMO Dr Chris Whitty stated “If you look at the R, and the behaviours, quite a lot of the change that led to the R going below one occurred well before, or to some extent before, the 23rd, when the full lockdown started.”
Why was he not challenged on this at the time by anyone on the Committee?
Why is this statement not being reported by ANY media outlet?
This one comment totally undermines and destroys the whole narrative of “following the science” to justify population lockdown and proves Sweden, Tanzania and Belarus among a very few others followed the correct course and 2000 years of medical experience dealing with these types of illnesses was the correct “treatment protocol”.
This, in effect, means that “the virus” infection rate was dropping drastically BEFORE the incarceration of the population started and that the existing precautions - wash hands properly, coughing etiquette, stay at home if you feel ill - were effectively controlling the spread of “the virus”.
It also means that the peak of the infections occurred PRIOR to the population incarceration commenced and as the average time from catching “the virus” to death has been widely stated as 23 days with the peak numbers of deaths occurring approximately 10-14 days from commencement of the incarceration it means that the imprisonment of the population and destruction of the economy has had NO effect whatsoever.
At the same Committee hearing the Chair, MP Jeremy Hunt stated "We all know that voluntary social distancing was introduced on 16 March, and it was made compulsory a week later on 23 March.”
It is ‘guidance” which has NO force of law nor is enforceable in England.
As the Chair of the relevant Committee and a Member of Parliament surely he knows that social distancing has never been law in England? If not, why not?
And why did no Committee member or witness challenge him on this statement?
Introduction of legislation
Since the Statutory Instruments that legislated the incarceration of the population and started the destruction of the economy of the country I have been researching the legislation and the order and way it was introduced and came into force does not seem to make much sense.
The original Health Protection (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 Statutory Instrument (now revoked) was written and immediately came into force on the 10th February 2020.
In this Statutory Instrument it states:
Serious and imminent threat declaration
3.—(1) These Regulations apply where the Secretary of State declares, by notice published on www.gov.uk, that the incidence or transmission of Coronavirus constitutes a serious and imminent threat to public health, and that the incidence or transmission of Coronavirus is at such a point that the measures outlined in these Regulations may reasonably be considered as an effective means of preventing the further, significant transmission of Coronavirus (“serious and imminent threat declaration”).
(2) The Secretary of State may revoke a serious and imminent threat declaration by way of a subsequent notice published on www.gov.uk.
(3) Before making a declaration under paragraph (1), or revoking a declaration under paragraph (2), the Secretary of State must have due regard to any advice from the Chief Medical Officer or one of the Deputy Chief Medical Officers of the Department of Health and Social Care.
I searched the www.gov.uk website and found the Serious and Imminent Threat Declaration on the Department of Health and Social Care website dated 10th February 2020 but could not find any reference to the required medical advice to be given prior to the declaration being made.
My first FOI request to find out what medical advice was given to the Secretary of State was to the Government Legal Department and they refused to supply any information as it would be too costly to find.
My second FOI request was to the DHSC and their reply pointed me to a webpage on the Government news page dated 30th January 2020 that stated:
"the 4 UK Chief Medical Officers consider it prudent for our governments to escalate planning and preparation in case of a more widespread outbreak.
For that reason, we are advising an increase of the UK risk level from low to moderate. This does not mean we think the risk to individuals in the UK has changed at this stage, but that government should plan for all eventualities."
There is nothing on it to suggest any major threat at that time nor was one imminent.
How did the 4 CMOs know 10 days in advance of a Statutory Instrument being written that “medical advice” would be required?
Why was this “advice” basically hidden on a webpage on a different department’s section and not on the DHSC webpages and why was it not linked to the Serious and Imminent threat Declaration?
As the FOI request was for the following information then either the above is the only advice given by the CMOs or the DHSC have withheld more detailed advice:
What was the advice given by the Chief Medical Officer or one of the Deputy Chief Medical Officers of the Department of Health and Social Care prior to this notice being issued?
Was this the only advice given by the CMOs at this time?
Then on the 19th March 2020 the coronavirus was downgraded and was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease.
On the 23rd March 2020, you Boris, announced the start of the “lockdown” and the relevant legislation was written, laid before Parliament and commenced the 26th March 2020.
So what we have is:
- issue of medical (non)advice 30th January 2020
- legislation introduced 10th February 2020
- issue declaration of imminent threat 10th February 2020
- downgrade the disease 19th March 2020
- introduce the population imprisonment 23rd March 2020
- introduce legislation 26th March 2020
Isn’t something wrong with this scenario?
Risk Assessments
Councils even admitted that there was no scientific evidence available either from their own research (if they have even done any which some Councils have admitted they have not) or had been promulgated from central Government that could be used to justify social distancing, mask wearing nor any of the other safety measures being foisted on the businesses and general population.
They admitted that they had no powers to enforce guidelines and it was the responsibility of each and every individual business to do their own risk assessment and to decide what measures were to be implemented on their premises as the relevant pieces of legislation are the various Health and Safety Acts.
Unfortunately what little information is available from central Government is insufficient and certainly not adequate enough for a risk assessment to be done properly and to be able to determine safe working practices at individual premises as per Health and Safety At Work legislation.
1 - Social distancing is based on absolutely NO scientific evidence whatsoever and certainly no research from the 1930s. Professor Robert Dingwall, who is a member of NERVTAG, admitted it was “conjured out of nowhere”.
2 - Below is an actual quote from an answer I received from a FOI request to a local Council:
“In terms of the scientific basis for social distancing requirements and Government’s advice, I believe this may have originated from a study undertaken in the 1930s, but that is probably a question you would be better placed directing to the Government. We are following, and will continue to follow, their lead when it comes to the best advice and guidance available to the public about staying alert and staying safe.”
3 - To protect themselves from a virus virologists wear full containment suits that are pressurised, use an independent air supply that is filtered and sterilised, undergo full decontamination procedures when taking off the protective suit and undergo years of training on how to use the PPE.
Over the many years of my career I have had to write a lot of risk assessments for operations that have very high risks involved and that could result in multiple fatalities.
Based on the information available on Government websites I could NOT write a risk assessment that contained supporting evidence to justify any measure to be used such as staying a little bit apart from others, standing behind a small perspex screen, wearing a “face covering”, using a face shield, not using cash and using an anti-bacterial hand sanitiser that could be written into a risk assessment trying to justify them when there is no evidence whatsoever that as a “safety measure” it actually has any effect on keeping people “safe” and would bring the risk as low as reasonably practicable.
At the moment any business that is operating solely using Government guidelines as their main reasons for instigating “covid-19 safe” measures is actually acting illegally as they do not have a fully supported risk assessment of their own and cannot prove, as per the relevant legislation, they have thought about what mitigations are required to operate safely.
How can businesses write a full, correct and detailed risk assessment with supporting documentation when the Government cannot or will not supply “the science” in full that is being used to justify guidance and publishing guidelines and frameworks and what little is available is contradicted by many independent sources of information?
PCR and antibody test
1 - the tests are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools
2 - the tests cannot tell if you are suffering from a virus
3 - Norway has just stopped using the PCR test for counting numbers of cases
4 - a “positive” test means absolutely nothing other than some viral material has been detected in the sample. It cannot even be proved it was not a contaminated sample to start with so it cannot be proved it came from you.
5 - the false positive/negative rate for tests combined with such a low prevalence of the virus in the UK gives a good chance that the positive tests being seen are actually false positives and there is no virus in the general population.
6 - if there was increasing signs of a 2nd wave coming then the following would NOT be happening:
• the positive rate staying the same percentage regardless of number of tests performed
• the hospital admissions dropping
the number of deaths dropping and now for 6 weeks in a row below the 5 year average
7 - the more tests you do the more false positive tests so you get an increase in “cases” even if the percentage of positives stay the same. This suggest that the “positives”are false positives as the rate of positive tests is within the sensitivity range of the tests.
The only “true” way to tell if a 2nd wave is coming is an increase exponetionally in positive test rates combined with increasing hospitalisations and deaths.
Why is there a deliberate policy of using “positive tests” that medically mean absolutely nothing and is not how the tests are supposed to be used being followed to justify ever draconian “local lockdowns” and to keep the majority of the population scared that they are in a lot more danger than they really are?
Masks:
More and more draconian laws are being introduced not just in this country but worldwide about wearing masks and face coverings.
“The science” is supposedly being followed but I cannot find one Randomised Control Trial (RCT) that has been carried anytime between yesterday and 20 or 30 years that has come to the conclusion that masks and/or face coverings have anything other than a negligible effect in stopping the spread of viruses.
And please, do not insult my intelligence by saying “but Asians wear them” as:
1 - I have worked with many Asians over the years and they tell me they wear masks against pollution, not for health reasons.
2 - Asian countries still have seasonal influenza outbreaks that sometimes are actually worse than in non-mask wearing countries.
3 - Asians suffer a lot of psychological problems of loneliness and depression and other similar mental health problems as they do not feel part of a society and are isolated.
The most truthful statement from Government is that push for mask wearing is psychological conditioning of the population to accept a “new normal” with restrictions hence Professor Susan Michie, a behavioural psychologist specialising in changing people’s behaviours within a health context being rolled out in front of the cameras almost continuously extolling the virtue of mask wearing for the good of society.
Notice I said “virtue”and not medical benefits of mask wearing.
Risks of mask/face coverings wearing include:
bacterial lung infections, already being observed
pleurisy, already being observed
dental problems, already being observed and nicknamed “mask mouth” by US dentists
breathing difficulties leading to medical treatment, already being observed. Dealt with it myself on a couple of occasions assisting an older person who was on the verge of collapse.
friction and anger between mask wearers and those who are exempt, increasing violence being observed
psychological problems of alienation and loneliness
increase in perception of fear that the virus is more dangerous and prevalent than it actually is
exasperating existing problems in those who are exempt but are complying as they feel pressurised or threatened into doing so, do not know they are exempt as they are not very well publicised or do not feel they can deal with having to explain why they are exempt to a stranger
The Law of Unintended but Totally Bleeding Obvious Consequences strikes again and instead of the Government’s stated aim that mask wearing would make the population feel safer and be more willing to get out and about and spend money, get on with a more “normal” life and so on it has had the complete opposite effect especially with all the new “covid-19 safe” shops, high streets and so on that are being implemented.
People feel in more danger now than back in April 2020 from a virus that is dying out so are only going out to do the absolute necessary minimum then going home again.
It is also dividing society and causing friction between those who are wear the masks and those who are exempt.
Why is the policy of mask or face coverings being pushed and expanded when there are no RCTs that come to the conclusion that it will prevent the spread of any virus and that countries and areas that have been wearing masks for longer and in more public places than in England still have many positive tests of coronavirus showing proving the policy is flawed and cannot be medically justified?
Professor Susan Michie is also a self-professed Communist and is a fully paid-up member of the Communist party of Britain.
Why is a known Communist being allowed to formulate and drive policy that is dividing the nation, subjecting the population to an increase in serious health complications and being allowed to psychologically programme the population into obedience?
Miscellaneous reports in recent months:
Quotes from a university research paper into Covid-19 death reporting from June 2020 that confirms previous research:
“Currently COVID-associated deaths or excess deaths are used to track the impact of the virus. However these figures may be distorted as to record a COVID-associated death you require only weak evidence that COVID ‘may’ have contributed to the death, and counting excess deaths assumes that any variation in weekly mortality relative to a five year average represents ‘excess’ deaths due to COVID without taking into account other drivers of mortality.”
“Actual deaths due to COVID are some 54% or 63% lower than implied by the standard excess death measure, and reported excess deaths likely include a significant number of non-COVID deaths.”
“Over the lockdown period as a whole Government policy has increased mortality rather than reduced it. The overall increase in mortality is a result of significant unintended consequences of the lockdown, for example, reduced A and E attendances and reduced cancer and cardiac treatments.
Why would this be? Falsified causes of death and incorrect death certificates? The almost complete shutdown of the NHS except for “covid-19” treatments?
England is the only country to show a “spike” in deaths for those between 15-44 years old.
Why would this happen? The coerced DNRs by our “NHS heroes”? Your researchers can earn their salary and find the same reports I did about vulnerable people and DNRs.
From the ONS website:
“The coronavirus (COVID-19) has had a large impact on the number of deaths registered over the last few months and is the main reason for deaths increasing above what is expected (the five-year average). The disease has had a larger impact on those most vulnerable (for example, those who already suffer from a medical condition) and those at older ages. Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. These deaths occurring earlier than expected could contribute to a period of deaths below the five-year average.”
It was known in Italy, Germany and Spain in late March, early April 2020 that up to 85% of those dying “with covid-19” would be dead in the next 3-9 months anyway. ONS just putting this on there website now.
Why did the Government ignore this when locking down the country and why are the Government or MSM not reporting this?
More people have died from gastro-intestinal problems and diahorrea than Covid-19 worldwide so far this year.
Why are world Governments not acting as seriously to these deaths as the ones attributed to “covid-19”?
The UN/WHO estimates 10 000 children a month are currently dying due to malnutrition and dirty water caused by lockdowns.
Why are world Governments not acting as seriously to these deaths as the ones attributed to “covid-19”?
Recent local lockdowns
These are the official weekly numbers for positive tests for the local lockdown areas:
Region name Number of deaths Five-year average Difference Percentage above average
North West 1197 1210 -13 -1.1
Yorkshire and The Humber 817 888 -71 -8.0
Please explain where the “spike” is that justified localised lockdowns?
The average age of people dying from covid-19 in UK is 80. The average age of death in the UK is 80.
In Scotland the average age of people dying from covid-19 is 78. The average age of death in Scotland is 76.
The latest research is showing there is almost zero transmission from young to old and almost zero transmission from asymptomatic persons to the general population.
Why are the Governments of England and Scotland using covid-19 cases in the young as justification for localised lockdowns, the upcoming reclosing of pubs and so on when the young and the general public are in almost zero danger?
Bulldog spirit? Long gone.
A thorn in Europe’s, Napoleon’s and Julius Caesar’s sides by being intransigent and didn’t bow down and submit to wannabe dictators? Long gone.
Now a country scared to contact it’s elected representatives, scared of authority and cowering behind ineffective masks while being “stay at home heroes” and being psychologically conditioned by constant bombardment of propaganda.
Are you proud of turning this country into a federally separate nation of 4 individual “nations” all working to different science and different agendas and run by “experts” who all have incestuous working and financial links to each other and others all over the world, to the vaccine industry, to certain very wealth individuals who have an agenda of their own they have been pushing for over 20 years and which the current farce is following almost exactly as they have predicted or warned on numerous occasions so either is is an amazing coincidence, they are psychic or something is not quite right with the scenarios being played out all of the world simultaneously and almost identically?
In the 1351 Treason Act it states
“Declaration what Offences shall be adjudged Treason."
"if a Man do levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm, be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm, or elsewhere"
Definition of adherent: A supporter, as of a cause or individual
In the 1848 Treason Act as in that it states as an act of treason:
“to intimidate or overawe both Houses or either House of Parliament”
No wonder there are reports in the independent media you are looking at revising the legislation with regards to treasonous behaviour as the current situation is verging on meeting these criteria. There are definitely adherents to persons in this country currently trying to overthrow our system of governance and Parliament is acting overawed and intimidated or they would not be so supine in challenging or questioning what is being forced onto the general population.
My wife is suffering both physically and mentally from the enforced incarceration and the constant bombardment of propaganda and psychological conditioning on behalf of the Government that is being aired continuously and without a break on TV, on local and national radio, in the MSM, in printed newspapers, on the internet and posted all over the street and premises windows. The bombardment is relentless.
From this moment in time, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, I hold you personally responsible for any and all consequences that arise from her physical and mental breakdown.
One final question:
Does it make you proud that when I tell people I am going to write this letter the standard answer is now “that’s dangerous, you will get a knock on the door and be carted off”?
I wait with bated breath and with hope in my heart for an answer that actually addresses these questions and issues in a calm, factual and knowledgable manner that is not full of platitudes, pre-prepared non-answers and lots of statements that mean nothing in reality and that does not insult my intelligence.
Yours in exasperation and disgust,
Open letter to PM sent 10 August 2020
Well done for smelling a rat by August 2020. It took me until October 2020 to write an open letter to Nicola Sturgeon on her “unfathomable” mishandling of Coronavirus: https://principia-scientific.com/open-letter-to-scotlands-first-minister-on-mishandling-of-coronavirus/
It wasn’t until early in 2021 that understood fully what was going on. I have since had lots of open letters published, not that I ever got a reply, culminating in this latest which you commented on: https://metatron.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-my-mp-culpable?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email