Sent to the Office of the Chief Coroner, the MHRA and the DHSC

will update each time I get a reply or more information

The original information request - tweaked slightly for each department:

Sirs,

I have been looking at the Office for National Statistics website and their weekly deaths report for the 26th August 2022. 

It seems that since approximately May 2021 the number of deaths in this country has been consistently and significantly higher than the 5 year average, between 15% and 30% depending on total numbers, whether the person died at home, in hospital or a care home and so on. 

Even when the deaths involving covid are removed - a diagnosis that requires no medical evidence of any kind to confirm and which the ONS defines quite ludicrously as:

"Coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths

COVID-19 deaths are those deaths registered in England and Wales in the stated week where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate. A doctor can certify the involvement of COVID-19 based on symptoms and clinical findings; a positive test result is not required."

these excess deaths in the past 18 months or so are very concerning and are now numbering in the tens of thousands in all age groups.

My questions are:

1 - has there been carried out or is carrying out any investigation into why the number of excess deaths have been so high for so long by the Coroner’s Office?

2 - supply any analysis or conclusions for any investigations in to the high number of excess deaths since May 2021

3 - is the Coroner’s Office recommending that autopsies be carried out to ascertain if the SARS-CoV-2 (covid) vaccinations may be a contributory cause into the excess deaths?

4 - are the above autopsies being carried out in the UK following a protocol such as that recommended by Prof. Dr. Burkhardt of the Reutlingen Pathology Laboratory or another protocol?

Yours sincerely

I received this reply from the Office of the Chief Coroner:

Thank you for your email to the Chief Coroner. He has asked that I reply on his behalf.

It may be helpful if I explain the role and function of coroners and the Chief Coroner.

The role of coroners, who are judges, is to investigate certain types of death (unnatural and violent deaths, where the deaths are in custody or otherwise in state detention or where the cause of death is unknown).  The role of the Chief Coroner is to provide judicial leadership for coroners, including by providing guidance, training.

It is not the function of the Chief Coroner to provide analysis or interpretation of mortality statistics, not least because many of the deaths in the statistics will be from natural causes (including from COVID-19). Coroners do not investigate individual deaths from natural causes.

Decisions about whether to request a post-mortem examination in an individual case are judicial decisions for individual coroners and the Chief Coroner has no power to require them to conduct post-mortem examinations in specific cases or types of case.

I hope this information is helpful.

So I have sent them this reply:

Sir,

Thank you and thank the Chief Coroner for the reply but a simple “yes” or “no” to the questions, especially Nos. 3 and 4 would have sufficed.

As it is now it looks like the Office of the Chief Coroner is avoiding the issue or is avoiding giving a definitive answer that may be used as evidence in any future inquiry.

Couple of further questions if you don’t mind:

1- you state "Decisions about whether to request a post-mortem examination in an individual case are judicial decisions for individual coroners and the Chief Coroner has no power to require them to conduct post-mortem examinations in specific cases or types of case.” But surely the Office of the Chief Coroner issues guidance notes, advice and recommendations surely on what tests to perform, when to carry out post-mortems and so on? Stating “unknown cause of death” or “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” or no previous history of xxxx and it happened/developed unexpectedly” are what can only be described colloquially as a cop-out.

2 - you state "Decisions about whether to request a post-mortem examination in an individual case are judicial decisions for individual coroners “. Who can request a coroner or how can a coroner be made to perform a post-mortem if they do not think one is required and how can extra tests be requested/performed to ascertain of a certain drug or medicine can be ruled out or shown to be responsible for a death if the deceased family think this is required?

3 - if a medicinal drug or procedure is suspected of, causes or contributes to a person’s death, no matter how much time has elapsed then it cannot be classified as a “natural cause” can it? 

It must be a suspicious or unexplained death that requires a full post-mortem and that might result in a verdict in a Coroner’s Court of unlawful killing that leads to a trial for corporate manslaughter, corporate murder or malfeasance/misfeasance in public office.

Here is a scenario - I admit I have not included links, names, countries, FOIs etc but I do have them and supporting documents available:

• October 2019 - a government changes the legislation on medicines and vaccinations to allow for a completely new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) before the Public Assessment Report (PAR), that requires completed Phase 3 safety trials to be completed, is written and released

• October 2019 - a government advisory panel on medicines and vaccinations releases a list of adverse events that they will be closely monitoring after a new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) is released in coming months

• December 2020 - the new type of vaccination never before used in humans (including many of the individual ingredients) is given Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) and immediately the roll-out of the new vaccination commences for vulnerable and “at high risk” persons - the exact group that was NOT included in the truncated safety trial

• February 2021 - the PAR is released with much of the safety trial data missing, biodistribution studies not performed, accusations of fake and forged data, the control group during the trial unblinded and given the vaccination, reported problems with the Quality Control during the manufacturing process resulting in variable amounts of the active ingredient in each batch between zero and 3x what the recommended dose should be, the numerous failures in the manufacturing process reported during an official inspection of one of the factories and many other issues with the vaccinations from all manufacturers

• children under 18, pregnant women, those with co-morbidities or serious health issues and the aged were NOT included in any safety trial prior to the roll-out of the vaccination in that particular demographic

• as the vaccination roll-out continues many countries worldwide notice a spike in all-cause mortality within 2 weeks of the vaccination being given

• as more groups are added into the roll-out the all-cause mortality increases and continues without subsequently dropping

• between Feb 2021 and to date many deaths are observed and reported many of which match the adverse events that were listed in Oct 2019 and that were to be monitored closely

• between Feb 2021 and to date many scientific research papers are released question the “safe and effective” narrative for the new type vaccinations and listing possible medical problems they will/are causing

• the cause of deaths for the increased mortality closely matches the earlier adverse events to be monitored closely after the vaccination roll-out

• mid-2022 independent research shows that the new type vaccinations are contributing to the cause death in an average of 5 months from the date of the person receiving the vaccination with verification of a correlation/causation with statements by funeral directors, embalmers and independent researchers

• independent post-mortems carried out in Germany show that the majority of deaths of those examined could be directly attributed to the new type vaccination

• from Oct 2019 to date there is still no official release of the truncated safety trial data for independent analysis nor and no official release of any data or information to support the “safe and effective” narrative in the long term (1 year plus)

If you require links to verify the above scenario for yourself, contacts of those who performed the research, the FOIs I have and so on then do not hesitate to get in contact with me as I will be only too pleased to supply the information for you and the Office of the Chief Coroner to perform further, more in-depth research in to this matter but to be honest it should not take longer than 10 minutes of independent searching of the internet to bring to light sufficient instances of the correlation between the introduction of the “covid vaccinations” and the increasing numbers of all-cause mortality around the world that are being reported in not just the UK but the EU, the USA and other countries.

I do know that correlation is not causation but as NOT one government or regulator worldwide has admitted to or released any research that shows that there is NOT a connection between the “covid vaccination” programme and the increased, sustained and continuing all-cause mortality numbers except to say “coincidence” or “safe and effective” without back-up evidence nor independently verified research to support their statements an official investigation is becoming ever more urgent.

UK coroners should be at the forefront of this as used to be known as being impartial and independent and led by facts and evidence. Or is this no longer the case?

The high all-cause mortality figures especially in younger age groups should be ringing alarm bells with those who are tasked with the responsibility to find out what really caused the death of a person because if it is shown to be a medicinal product then the regulators need to know so that they can review the medicine’s safety record and take the necessary steps to stop further harm and deaths from it. 

Without this independent input the regulators cannot perform their duties in full can they and a dangerous and unsafe medicine will continue to be used and continue to contribute to deaths.

Yours sincerely

Will update as I get more replies.

UPDATES:

UKHSA says “nothing to do with us guv’, speak to the MHRA”.

One local coroner’s office says “we won’t answer as we don’t come under the FOI legislation as we are part of the judiciary”.

Sent tweaked e-mails to:

• Royal College of Pathologists

• Pathological Society

• The Home Office - decided to deal with my e-mail as normal correspondence, not FOI for some reason (not explained)

• The Cabinet Office

• 10 Downing Street

• College of Policing - they sent an immediate reply saying my query was “resolved” and nothing else so I guess they will not respond

One of the coroner's offices I contacted is now dealing with this: https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/local-hubs/telford/newport/2022/09/27/sudden-death-of-newport-dairy-herdsman-18-to-be-subject-of-inquest/ Wonder what he will do and if I've planted a seed?

Also received quite a nice e-mail from another local coroner to which I answered in full with the scenario e-mail:

I understand that you have spoken to my office as well as emailing in with concerns around statistics for weekly death reports.

It would be difficult to say whether the Coroners Office has observed a rise in the number of deaths since the 1st of May 2021. As you will appreciate, only certain deaths are reported to my office. That is inevitably quite variable and any meaningful analysis very difficult simply based on the number of referrals.

In relation to autopsies carried out, these are individual judicial decisions based on the reported circumstances of each death. The circumstances in which a coroner may order a post-mortem examination to be made will again be infinitely variable.

I appreciate this may not assist you greatly, but it is important to understand that deaths are reported into the Coroners Office in accordance with the Reporting of Deaths Regulations. From that point on, how each death is investigated is a matter for each coroner making an independent judicial decision based on the facts presented and what appears to be a reasonable and a proportionate inquiry into those facts.