UKHSA states that they have no proof SARS-CoV-2 causes illness in humans
And they are only now starting trials to see if it does
In a FOI the MHRA sent this link:
In it is the quote:
"Saliva will be collected from healthy adult volunteers at PHE Porton Down" which is then spiked with virus stock.
"Saliva samples from 15 different individuals will be spiked with SARS-CoV-2 virus stock (7.8x106 plaque forming units(pfu)/mL VIC/1/2020) "
But they have never categorically stated they have SARS-CoV-2 virus fully isolated, only some genomes and proteins. So I asked them and the UKHSA why are saliva samples being used to "test" the LFTs as opposed to the swabbing almost to the brain and to the back of the throat.
I received an answer back from the UKHSA about where the original SARS-CoV-2 virus stock came from. The answer was basically "we don't know, ask the DHSC, they may know". This was then changed when challenged:
Also asked them how they knew what they were using to calibrate the tests with was SARS-CoV-2. Their answer was when translated from their gobbledlygook to plain English "we were told to look for something in March 2020 by the WHO, took swabs from some people ill with cold like symptoms that matched what they wanted, this we assume is SARS-CoV-2 and we use that".
They also admit that whatever they have found in these samples has not been proven to cause problems in humans and that back in 2020 they thought it wrong and unethical to inject it into healthy people to see what happened as they claim that they did not know how to cure it but now 2 years later they have started to run trials doing exactly that. Here are the links they sent:
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/233514/covid-19-human-challenge-study-reveals-detailed/
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1121993/v1
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-04-19-human-challenge-trial-launches-study-immune-response-covid-19
So for over 2 years they had no idea if what they found in the swabs and called SARS-CoV-2 as it matched what they had been told to look for but could not prove was even SARS-CoV-2 even made anyone ill.
It find it amazing how many ant-narrative substackers there are who readily admit how dodgy the PCR tests are but who have spent virtually zero time to understand and employ the gained knowledge of the fraud of the PCR to pull the rug out from under the Plandemic. The gist of your article here as I see it is more or less what I have been asserting. There is a giant dog and pony show of GoF research, or the revolting prospect devouring some verboten raw meat, to conflate the fear of what would obviously be a chimeric disaster of death in accidental or deliberate military release that only Hollywood could imagine yet what we have is something, that until the poisons were injected, killed only people who were elderly and or not well, and only because using treatments that would benefit them is forcefully prevented through threat of loosing credentials all the way to not filling prescriptions. And the proof of this phantom menace is an Emergency Use Authorized test not fit for purpose. And digging into index cases makes ya go hmmmm. Sounds like bacterial pneumonia (just like the Spanish Flu retrospective).