6 weeks - what the UK Government calls long-term monitoring of the Covid-19 jibby jabbies
Will find the actual quote in a FOI and post in full
While submitting FOIs a few years ago I asked the UK Government about long-term monitoring for SAEs they were planning on doing or were doing at the time as part of trying to find out where the “safe and effective” mantra came from and forgot about it.
Until recently when I posted a comment on Steve Kirsch’s substack about his ONS experience and it jogged my memory.
I remember that one answer I received was that planned “long-term monitoring” was for 6 weeks only from date of jibbyjabby to end of monitoring as longer than this was not required.
Yep that’s correct - long-term monitoring is 6 weeks.
I will admit now to you all that my filing of all the FOIs is woefully inadequate and not very organised as back then no-one - no MSM, no journalist, no independent media, no MP, no Minister, no regulator, no-one who is now professing they were investigating all along - was interested so I was doing the FOIs just to keep me amused so I now have to find the actual FOI response that verifies the 6 week claim above.
When I do find it I will either update this post or write a complete new one.
Thanks for doing this.
When they were initially testing the jabs I looked up the trial protocols (they have to be published online by law) and I could find no plans to monitor the participants for longer than 6 weeks. Also I could not see any mechanism to monitor serious adverse events.
This is partly why I and my family never took the jabs. The trial protocols were a joke. I have a long career in research, and I know what a randomised trial is supposed to look like.
I asked my MP John Whittingdale on six or seven occasions to back up his claim that the MHRA not only have fully tested the products but we’re actively monitoring them but he never once supplied any documentation to support his claim