When they were initially testing the jabs I looked up the trial protocols (they have to be published online by law) and I could find no plans to monitor the participants for longer than 6 weeks. Also I could not see any mechanism to monitor serious adverse events.
This is partly why I and my family never took the jabs. The trial protocols were a joke. I have a long career in research, and I know what a randomised trial is supposed to look like.
I asked my MP John Whittingdale on six or seven occasions to back up his claim that the MHRA not only have fully tested the products but we’re actively monitoring them but he never once supplied any documentation to support his claim
Thanks for doing this.
When they were initially testing the jabs I looked up the trial protocols (they have to be published online by law) and I could find no plans to monitor the participants for longer than 6 weeks. Also I could not see any mechanism to monitor serious adverse events.
This is partly why I and my family never took the jabs. The trial protocols were a joke. I have a long career in research, and I know what a randomised trial is supposed to look like.
I asked my MP John Whittingdale on six or seven occasions to back up his claim that the MHRA not only have fully tested the products but we’re actively monitoring them but he never once supplied any documentation to support his claim
I've got some FOIs too. I think they post them all, anonymised, on their website?
We need a Health Minister who takes this seriously. Maybe a decade from now, like the Horizon scandal? 😕
Thank you for keeping plugging away at this. I have done this more recently which may or may not be of some interest.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/uk-cabinet-2024-a-wry-sideways-look