I hope you are giving this info to a lawyer. Attorney Thomas Renz in Ohio, USA is a good one who has a lawsuit going with inaccurate PCR tests part of it.
the imperial link is about a study where they claim they gave people "sars-cov2" but it doesn't have a control group. what they gave them is a manufactured product. It says "the virus was isolated by inoculation of a qualified cGMP Vero cell line with the clinical sample", a "nose/throat swab" i.e. they made something and called it "the virus" rather than isolated 'a virus' from nature. Then:
" A seed virus stock was then generated by a further passage on the same cGMP Vero cell line. The seed virus stock was then used to manufacture the challenge virus in accordance with cGMP at the Zayed Centre for Research GMP manufacturing facility of Great Ormond Street Hospital, and a challenge virus master virus bank (MVB) was produced. Individual dose inoculum vials were then produced in accordance with cGMP by dilution of the cGMP MVB with sucrose diluent. "
This in no way represents something that would actually happen in normal life. The participants might been stressed by the belief they were being infected with a dangerous virus with symptoms that they had already been conditioned to expect. This could thus have caused a nocebo effect together with a reaction to the decaying proteins or 'live vaccine' whatever they were investingating etc..
Participants were "paid about £4,000 for their two to three-week stay" and shown pictures of people playing computer games, reading books, smiling at their clipboards etc. in corporate quarantine faciltites owned by the 'challenge virus' manufacturers. They were told it was to "develop vaccines" rather than establish if there was a virus:
Maybe they were thus on friendly terms with their hosts and under pressure to provide desirable results that could not in anycase be verified. They could have been preselected based on their attitudes to 'vaccines' and the location where adverts were placed, asked about in the registration form.. There was an option of flyer/handout for example.
"Open Orphan plc, has signed a contract with Imperial College London, as part of a Wellcome Trust funded initiative to manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 challenge virus. The contract is worth £3 million and under this agreement hVIVO will develop a new SARS-CoV-2 challenge virus"
at no point was "a virus" labelled "sars-cov2" isolated that could have been used in this study. only a pcr process linked to some primers was used to tie any of this to a computer generated sequence labelled sars-cov2. I'd say the clue about what they were really doing might be "Open Orphan" plc. Participants had to be on the pill etc. https://odysee.com/@TheVirusHoax:5/Dr.-Stefan-Lanka---In-Silico-Explained-(September-25th,-2021):8
hmm so they might have been using it as a loophole to illegally conduct a non medical regulated trial whilst it was actually a 'vaccine' or 'biological' of sorts that needed to have medicinal value. they were up to no good that's for sure. there is a legal case there I think to prosecute them. an important one aswell.
The trial seemed to have a strangely high proportion of males, a quite young age group with very strict inclusion requirments for contraceptives. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04865237
The above posts started out as a response to claims there was a virus so that might have skewed them a bit but I changed quite a lot coz it is like when something reaches a head and your suddenly trying to make a different point about the upside down world of 'viruses' and 'vaccines'. For example this bit:
"at no point was "a virus" labelled "sars-cov2" isolated that could have been used in this study."
That doesn't mean that there wasn't a lot of research into the design or choice of code used, only that there wasn't something fitting the definition of a pathogenic virus with published information about it's isolation. maybe there is secret information about what 'it' is. perhaps to do with pheremones I'd guess.
I hope you are giving this info to a lawyer. Attorney Thomas Renz in Ohio, USA is a good one who has a lawsuit going with inaccurate PCR tests part of it.
the imperial link is about a study where they claim they gave people "sars-cov2" but it doesn't have a control group. what they gave them is a manufactured product. It says "the virus was isolated by inoculation of a qualified cGMP Vero cell line with the clinical sample", a "nose/throat swab" i.e. they made something and called it "the virus" rather than isolated 'a virus' from nature. Then:
" A seed virus stock was then generated by a further passage on the same cGMP Vero cell line. The seed virus stock was then used to manufacture the challenge virus in accordance with cGMP at the Zayed Centre for Research GMP manufacturing facility of Great Ormond Street Hospital, and a challenge virus master virus bank (MVB) was produced. Individual dose inoculum vials were then produced in accordance with cGMP by dilution of the cGMP MVB with sucrose diluent. "
This in no way represents something that would actually happen in normal life. The participants might been stressed by the belief they were being infected with a dangerous virus with symptoms that they had already been conditioned to expect. This could thus have caused a nocebo effect together with a reaction to the decaying proteins or 'live vaccine' whatever they were investingating etc..
Participants were "paid about £4,000 for their two to three-week stay" and shown pictures of people playing computer games, reading books, smiling at their clipboards etc. in corporate quarantine faciltites owned by the 'challenge virus' manufacturers. They were told it was to "develop vaccines" rather than establish if there was a virus:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210217130602/https://ukcovidchallenge.com/covid-19-volunteer-trials/
The sun labelled participants "hero Brits" and said "One keen volunteer told The Times: "If I die, better to die gloriously.""
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13574220/world-first-covid-trial-2500-brits-deliberately-catch-virus/
Maybe they were thus on friendly terms with their hosts and under pressure to provide desirable results that could not in anycase be verified. They could have been preselected based on their attitudes to 'vaccines' and the location where adverts were placed, asked about in the registration form.. There was an option of flyer/handout for example.
"Open Orphan plc, has signed a contract with Imperial College London, as part of a Wellcome Trust funded initiative to manufacture a SARS-CoV-2 challenge virus. The contract is worth £3 million and under this agreement hVIVO will develop a new SARS-CoV-2 challenge virus"
https://novuscomms.com/2021/05/09/open-orphan-orph-3m-covid-19-challenge-virus-manufacturing-contract-for-hvivo-based-on-new-covid-19-variants/
at no point was "a virus" labelled "sars-cov2" isolated that could have been used in this study. only a pcr process linked to some primers was used to tie any of this to a computer generated sequence labelled sars-cov2. I'd say the clue about what they were really doing might be "Open Orphan" plc. Participants had to be on the pill etc. https://odysee.com/@TheVirusHoax:5/Dr.-Stefan-Lanka---In-Silico-Explained-(September-25th,-2021):8
hmm so they might have been using it as a loophole to illegally conduct a non medical regulated trial whilst it was actually a 'vaccine' or 'biological' of sorts that needed to have medicinal value. they were up to no good that's for sure. there is a legal case there I think to prosecute them. an important one aswell.
The trial seemed to have a strangely high proportion of males, a quite young age group with very strict inclusion requirments for contraceptives. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04865237
The above posts started out as a response to claims there was a virus so that might have skewed them a bit but I changed quite a lot coz it is like when something reaches a head and your suddenly trying to make a different point about the upside down world of 'viruses' and 'vaccines'. For example this bit:
"at no point was "a virus" labelled "sars-cov2" isolated that could have been used in this study."
That doesn't mean that there wasn't a lot of research into the design or choice of code used, only that there wasn't something fitting the definition of a pathogenic virus with published information about it's isolation. maybe there is secret information about what 'it' is. perhaps to do with pheremones I'd guess.