MSM finally catching up about the 2019 lockdowns not being required
Only been trying to tell them for 3 years and got nowhere.
I read this today:
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/08/covid-infections-peaked-prior-to-lockdown-any-policy-riding-the-down-wave-would-have-worked/
Well I’ve been trying since back in 2020 and sent the links to Toby Young - and many others in MSM including national newspapers, TV “news”, independent media and so on- along with the official video CMO Whitty admitting this.
I even sent this video to the Hallett Inquiry as evidence.
And got total, utter and complete deafening silence in return for 3 years.
Here’s my substack on the subject - one of my first:
CMO Whitty on 21 July 2020
The absolutely most important and momentous quote from CMO Chris Whitty on the 21st July 2020 in the Parliamentary Health and Social Care Committee hearing: “If you look at the R, and the behaviours, quite a lot of the change that led to the R going below one occurred well before, or to some extent before, the 23rd, when the full lockdown started.”
Now “they” seem to be waking up.
This is the absolutely most important and momentous quote from CMO Chris Whitty on the 21st July 2020:
“If you look at the R, and the behaviours, quite a lot of the change that led to the R going below one occurred well before, or to some extent before, the 23rd, when the full lockdown started.”
Why was he not challenged on this at the time by anyone on the Committee?
Why is this statement not being reported by ANY media outlet until today?
This one comment totally undermines and destroys the whole narrative of “following the science” to justify population lockdown and proves Sweden, Tanzania and Belarus among a very few others followed the correct course and 2000 years of medical experience dealing with these types of illnesses was the correct “treatment protocol”.
This, in effect, means that “the virus” infection rate was dropping drastically BEFORE the incarceration of the population started and that the existing precautions - wash hands properly, coughing etiquette, stay at home if you feel ill - were effectively controlling the spread of “the virus”.
It also means that the peak of the infections occurred PRIOR to the population incarceration commenced and as the average time from catching “the virus” to death has been widely stated as 23 days with the peak numbers of deaths occurring approximately 10-14 days from commencement of the incarceration it means that the imprisonment of the population and destruction of the economy has had NO effect whatsoever.
You can download it yourself on their website - set the start time at 10:58:00 and end time as 11:01 - their instructions are easy to follow.
https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/4b2dfc60-0c0e-47fe-8b78-1db2f135a004
Wonder how long before the MSM mention this:
ONS admitted in mid-2020 most "covid" deaths would have happened anyway
In this ONS weekly death report and a few others posted just before and after this one https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending17july2020
In this ONS weekly death report and a few others posted just before and after this one https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending17july2020
Section 2: "The disease has had a larger impact on those most vulnerable (for example, those who already suffer from a medical condition) and those at older ages. Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. These deaths occurring earlier than expected could contribute to a period of deaths below the five-year average.”
Read it again and digest it properly.
“Some of these deaths would have likely occurred over the duration of the year but have occurred earlier because of COVID-19. “
FYI, see my emails to Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance:
- The reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the most reckless and grossly
irresponsible 'public health' response in history, 6 April 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/sars-cov-2-virus-the-most-reckless-and-grossly-irresponsible-response.pdf
- Reckless and grossly irresponsible response to covid-19 - the UK in the thick of it, 28 July 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/07/reckless-and-grossly-irresponsible-response-to-covid-19-the-uk-in-the-thick-of-it.pdf
Well, yes, and no. Your deductive reasoning seems to be based on the assumption that there was a novel deadly virus spreading which hit our shores in late February / early March.
However, as we now know, most of the deaths were in fact, due to what might politely be termed “medical misadventure”.
The decline in deaths was due to habituation to the sudden disruption to health and social care consequent to the hysteria, the realization that what was being done was inhumane and quite simply wrong medically, and the depletion of people vulnerable to such ill treatment.
Let’s not prop up their fraudulent fictional narrative with such analyses.