Next question might be: who exactly within DHSC signed off on that request?
We know the request was to Hancock, but it might be significant to know who the request was from? Then we might be able to ask them specifically why they requested it. Trouble is, they're all as slippery as eels. Very hard to pin down responsibility. But you're worrying away at them like a terrier with a shoe! The truth will out eventually.
Next question might be: who exactly within DHSC signed off on that request?
We know the request was to Hancock, but it might be significant to know who the request was from? Then we might be able to ask them specifically why they requested it. Trouble is, they're all as slippery as eels. Very hard to pin down responsibility. But you're worrying away at them like a terrier with a shoe! The truth will out eventually.
The request was from Hancock to the MHRA.
If it's anything like the LFT repurposing request from the DHSC to the MHRA it won't have a name on the bottom nor even a job title.